by drhanl » Sun Nov 06, 2011 8:02 am
thanks on mine. I think you have it right. Even though Manningham looks like a great play, I still think he is the riskiest. I could see the Giants laying a goose egg. It's a whole lot easier game planning for Jacobs, ballard and manningham than Nicks and Bradford! I would go with your studs, even though Manningham looks good on paper.