We have a big dilemma in our money league (all personal friends) which we need to have straightened out ASAP. I will try to lay the situation out as simple as possible and without describing the 2 parties involved. All feedback would be much much appreciated.
Here's the situation our 12 team, 1 player keeper league faces now in week 11:
Team 1 (2nd place, 8-2) originally traded his Jackie Battle and Owen Daniels to Team 2 (12th and last place, 1-9 record) for Jimmy Graham.
Only 2 people in the league really made a stink over it but it was enough to have that trade revoked.
Team 1 (again, 2nd place, 8-2) comes back with Jackie Battle and Matthew Stafford to Team 2 (12th and last place, 1-9 record) for Jimmy Graham.
This trade is now pending league vote.
Here's my question to you all: Considering the original trade proposition which was rejected and also factoring in Team 2's last place (and mathematically out of playoffs) positioning, does the new trade being made appear to be legitimate and in good honest faith or should there be a case made for collusion/fraudulent intent.