Gaffney, Moss or Mike Wallace? Seattle or Washnton DEF? WHIR

[angels7777]

Sounds crazy but Gaffney's been more consistent lately and Pitt has ????????

.5 PPR

[11stever11]

I would stick with Wallace who has much higher upside. I would go Seattle D over Washington as well. good luck!

help me please?
viewtopic.php?t=511677

[JMT75]

Not crazy at all with Batch in there at QB. I'm a big proponent of sticking with your studs though in crunch time unless you have a really good alternative. I don't see Gaffney as that alternative.

That being said....Vikings pass D is awful so combine that with Batch and if you have a hunch go with your gut.

[abby1]

Wallace and Washington

[angels7777]

Wallace has had a points AVG under 10 over the last 4 weeks and now he has Batch at QB - no thanks...

[daytripper]

gaffney and seattle

help me...

viewtopic.php?t=511715

[angels7777]

Game Day!

[angels7777]

[drhanl]

I would play Moss for sure. He gets the RZ targets, and still gets more overall targets than Gaffney. He should connect on more the 3 or 4 today. I like him with Big Ben out.

Def. Total toss up. I think that SEA is the safe play. They for sure will have a positive number, but also probably nothing stellar. WAS could put up a big number, but a little more risky, IMO.

I would probably bet WAS. But, I have the same decision, and have SEA starting right now, cause I don't want the risk.

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=511759

[joegoody41]

I'd go with Wallace, but it's close. Gaffney and Moss are competing for targets more than Wallace is with his teammates. Go with SEA defense.

Good luck!

Help me out?
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=511786&p=3412221#p3412221