Would he even do it? I honestly think Vick will have a bounce-back year, but Wk 1 left me worried and I'm no dummy: Brady >>> Vick, but less so in our league with 4-pt PaTD's / 6-pt RuTD's. If he were to accept, I'd hold the Chief's backfield, and he the Bill's backfield - i suppose he might find that appealing, but would he give up Brady and think Spiller is > Charles since he'd at least hold the bills backfield?
My main questions come down to Spiller: is he for real, and Charles: does his knee hold up?
Of course, my TE slot is crap (unless Rudy pays off), but I felt compelled to take Nicks in the 5th on a value pick (and since we only start 1 mandatory RB). Either way, i'm sure he isn't letting Witten go in a package deal like this.
Any help is appreciated -- WHIR! Thanks!
Last edited by Psychobroker on Wed Sep 12, 2012 2:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
I feel the same way, but im sure the other GM would react like your first post (ADP), so maybe I offer something like Vick/Hillis/Nicks for Brady/Jackson/ABrown? He gets a bump at WR2 and keeps his #2 pick (Brady was his #1 of course).
I like it. Really just comes down to how much he values fred jackson even though he is hurt. If he thinks he is coming back as an rb1 then he will still laugh at this deal. It doesnt hurt your depth and you win with brady at qb, is a more fair deal than last. Really depends on his perception of fjax. Go for it, good luck.
6pt tds, 1 pt ppr competitive 10 man league QB Rodgers, Smith RB MJD, Matthews, Spiller, McGahee, R. williams WR: J. Jones, Torry Smith, Lafell, Britt, Young TE: Hernandez, Bennet D:Eagles
I don't see him taking it. Brady is a MUCH safer option at QB than Vick (see flak jacket and rib injury). Unless he is crazy high on Spiller, I don't see it happening but go for it. It's a good trade for you!
12 team auction (100$) Wilson 3$, Dalton 4$ Foster $30, Charles $16, Tate 2$, Wilson 10$ V. Jackson 10$, Boldin 3$, Garcon 4$, Witten, 4$, T. Austin $5, Patterson 2$, Tate 3$, Dobson 1$ Tucker, K 1$,Tynes, K 1$ NYG D, 1$