^He makes a great point. Rodgers numbers will go up starting next week. Romo will not average what he has scored last game eitehr.
To answer your question, though, your team does look pretty good if you make that trade. Your one "weakness" is your flex spot, but Maclin is a great player for that spot in a 16 team league. But with Murray and Romo you'll have a good QB and some bench depth. I can't imagine any other team has a better combination of 3 RBs in a 16 team league like that.
Didn't mean to be a smartass, but I read a stat somewhere that a pretty high percentage of the teams that won their fantasy leagues last year had Rodgers on them. The guy is a killer QB and can also get you very valuable rushing yards/rushing TDs. He hasn't done anything to be sick of yet. But that trade has appeal.
I would also like to extend an invitation for you to join my fantasy league, where the trading of aaron rodgers will be meet with much enthusiasm by whomever you offer the trade to.
If you are going to trade him, trade him for someone good......both murray(RB2) and Romo(QB2) are below average.....I have Romo in the 20-25 range of qb's.....and Murray one year...just not sold yet...but he is probably a RB 15-20......I think you can get ALOT more for him......
No problem trading any player...but get value...not a couple of below everage players.
^I wouldn't call top 15 "below average". But I disagree with that ranking too. IMO, Murray is a top 10 RB if he stays healthy. He has averaged more than 5 ypc in his first 14 NFL games. By the end of his 140 total yard effort against the giants, he was being played as the 3rd down back as well.
I like Murray to have a better year than RBs in the Lynch, Gore, Turner, S.Jackson tier of RBs, though Murray is most likely behind the top tier (McCoy, Rice, Foster, McFadden & Matthews if healthy).
I have a really hard time believing that is the lineup of a team in a 16 team league. Not even going to comment on the fact that you want to deal Rodgers after 2 games