Gronk or Rudolph & Stafford, Rivers or Flacco? - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Who to Start/Bench

Gronk or Rudolph & Stafford, Rivers or Flacco?

Moderator: Football Moderators

Gronk or Rudolph & Stafford, Rivers or Flacco?

Postby phluux » Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:49 am

Gronk would be a no brainer but he's playing hurt with Hernandez coming back, and they're in Seattle. NE does have lots of weapons though, and I'm playing Ridley and Welker anyway. 'Skins giving up points to TEs.

I have Stafford and Flacco, but someone dropped Rivers. I could drop someone to pick him up. Stafford isn't playing well and could go one way or the other in Philly. Flacco is inconsistent but normally plays OK at home.
phluux
Defensive Assistant
Defensive Assistant

User avatar
Response Team
Posts: 507
(Past Year: 80)
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Gronk or Rudolph & Stafford, Rivers or Flacco?

Postby Red Winger » Sun Oct 14, 2012 10:18 am

I agree with you on Rudolph. You would have too many eggs in one basket there. Diversify your portfolio!

As far as QB, Dallas has some pretty good Pass D, but I like the way Flacco has been playing this season. Dallas is almost as much a mess as the jets this season. I'd go with Joe. If you aren't sold there, I like the matchup of Rivers better than Stafford.

Hope that helps! ;-D

Help! viewtopic.php?f=19&t=525988
The key to a winning season is focusing on one opponent at a time. Winning one week at a time. Never look back and never look ahead.
Chuck Noll
Red Winger
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar

Posts: 698
(Past Year: 2)
Joined: 5 Nov 2005
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Orlando, FL


Return to Who to Start/Bench

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 10:16 hours
(and 38 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact