sorry, another "veto trade?" thread

[shawngee03]

team A(4-2) trades mendenhall and torrey smith
team B(2-4) trades roddy white

team A
rodgers
cj2K, bradshaw, spiller
cj green, torrey smith

bench: mendy, crabtree, junk...

team b
romo, alex smith
demarco, dwilly, kevin smith(haha)
roddy, sidney ricepierre garcon

bench: junk


so yes, team b sucks. so he is trading a stud for depth....2 playable guys.

i dont personally have a problem w it. i offer out 50 trade offers like this every year. classic 2 for 1. but ive had a couple teams express concern. they think its roster dumping or collusion. they have actually said they think its cheating

so thoughts?

thanks

[The Lung]

Get out of that league, they just don't "get it."

Trading Arian Foster for a kicker is collusion. Anything short of that is fair game.

No one has any proof that Mendenhall and Torrey Smith won't be the very thing that turns around that 2-4 team.
Or that Roddy White is going to make the 4-2 team an unstoppable force.

The managers in that league claiming roster dumping, collusion, cheating, etc. should be barred forever from fantasy football.

[stomperrob]

No reason to veto that trade - see: viewtopic.php?t=524568

[jonnyfootball]

I'd say Veto. It is unfair.

[stomperrob]

I'd say Veto. It is unfair.

That's an abuse of the veto power - only veto when there is collusion or cheating. It's not up to the other owners to decide what's fair, everyone values players differently - let people run their team as they see fit, don't try to micro-manage everything!