Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

by **Kanos** » Sat Oct 20, 2012 1:49 pm

Person A is going to give Germaine Gresham to Person B. In return he gets Ahmad Bradshaw (who is currently on person B's bench because he has great running back depth). After a week they will trade back. Keep in mind, person B already has Scott Chandler, ranked number 7 in tight ends on ESPN this week.

I find this to be collusion an feel I should veto it.

The trade is one-sided, and aren't one week bye trades frowned upon? It's a ten-man league so everyone has a good player or two on their bench, wouldn't it be bull if we all worked together to make the best teams every week?

What do you think?

Thanks,

nbay23 · by **nbay23** » Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:32 pm

Absolutely collusion. First of all, the trade is lopsided. Then you have the trade back which is a no-no. Either one is a valid reason for a veto. But doing both calls for the commissioner to get involved and put a stop to this even without a vote.

BTW, If I was to trade Bradshaw, I would put him on the open market and try for a WR1/2 or TE1. The fact that he is only dealing with person B means its collusion all the way