Stafford for Vick? WHIR

[chibears814]

I have been offered Matthew Stafford for my Michael Vick in my 10 team league. I already have RGIII and start him typically every week (He has a buy on week 10) but cannot decide whether to accept this trade or not. Stafford has been stinking it up over the first few weeks and Vick is a turnover machine. Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.

[msukc]

I think this is pretty even unless dynasty or keeper type leagues. Stafford long term is better than Vick. Currently Stafford is struggling. As a Lions fan, he has been awful this year. No reason for you to make this deal.

viewtopic.php?t=527327

[FirstCoast]

Stafford doesn't turn the ball over nearly as much as Vick, and Staff still gets plenty of yards. As bad as his season has been, he's still 14th in ESPN scoring at 15.7 ppg, not too bad really.

[the prize fighter]

vick has more upside if he gets it together but like the guy said before me... stafford doesnt turn the ball over... Good luck! thanks for the help

[kman711]

I say keep Staff.


God forbid RG3 goes down, I would rather have Staff then Vick. Staff has a better chance of turning it around, and overall feel he has slightly more value.
Thanks for your help

[drew1265]

I'd rather have stafford, Vick is too injury/turnover prone. I think stafford picks it up a bit.

Help me:http://www.fantasyfootballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=527364

[ShaneDav122]

I'd rather have Stafford, he's not the greatest at staying healthy but he's better than Vick...and frankly I'm just waiting on "the big one" that takes RG3 out for an extended period of time so I would want some stability behind him

Help me? viewtopic.php?t=527340

[Cinemafreak1]

Kep Stafford, Vick will end up on IR this year.

Please help.

viewtopic.php?t=527354