Jump on this-spiller,dwyer, pettigrew for howling. miller

[Hogan]

Ok it sounds funny but I'm contemplating this trade. I've been offered Spiller, Pettigrew and Dwyer for Heath Miller and Howling. Normally this is a no brainer but I just don't see where I would play Spiller and Heath is the no 2 fantasy tight end behind gronk right now. Here is my current lineup. Non ppr league. We start 1 QB, 2 RB, 3WR, 1 TE, 1K and 1 DEF, no flex

QB--Vick,Cutler
RB--Peterson, McCoy, Howling, Hillis, Tate
WR--Marshall, LLoyd, Torry Smith, Cobb
TE--Miller, Rudolph
K--Tynes
DEF--N.E, Denver

[fierro33]

i like this trade. spiller is still a great rb to own....its basically spiller and pettigrew for miller....howling and dwyer arent worth much

viewtopic.php?t=528351

[Hogan]

Only problem is Spiller will never see my starting lineup except for injury to Peterson or McCoy. Miller is an every week starter for me.

[Hogan]

Anyone else?

[Hogan]

Bump, trade deadline today

[Mean One]

I would keep both Miller and Howling for now. Pettigrew and Dwyer are nursing nagging injuries so the other owner is looking to dump quantity for quality at your expense.

Until Rudolph learns to seperate from coverages and use his diminitive stature to his ability his production will continue to slide. You need Miller for now, and if you do this trade you would have to start Pettigrew with a nagging knee injury. Dwyer and Spiller may never see your starting lineup, plus you would have to drop a player to make this trade work. I would stay put.

[Hogan]

1 yes 1 no, anyone else?

[tantrix1969]

I'd pass on this too, losing Miller isn't worth getting Spiller just for bench depth

[JT Money]

Don't do it.
It's nice having a tight end that puts up consistent points. It's not worth losing that for bench depth.