Trade evaluation

[ergofrog22]

Well, I have been offered a trade which is being questioned by the commish as whether it should be vetoed:

I get:
A Foster HOU RB
Cook TEN TE
Nugent CIN K

I give:
Lloyd NE WR
Matthews SD RB
Gonzo ATL TE

The other team has been struggling with depth and I want to upgrade at RB. I could also swapp Decker DEN WR for Lloyd.

[sledge4]

Overall your trade partner is getting the most value across the board. The commish is probably concerned because of the kicker being involved since kickers are generally a dime-a-dozen.

You could probably just to Foster for Lloyd/Mathews.

[woowoo crew]

i disagree with above: you can't get foster for lloyd and mathews.

i don't see a problem with it. tony gonzalez has been best TE in the league. so you're giving the best TE, a solid RB, and a decent WR for the most talented RB in the league. (well peterson might be most talented) anyway, i think it's fair.

[Whoop-On-U]

I don't see the issue here. You're basically trading Lloyd, Mathews, and Gonzo for Foster. You're giving up more than enough.

[feldspar]

I agree with Whoop. This is essentially a 3-for-1 trade. I like Foster, but he's not worth 3 solid roster spots.

[macmillanben1]

I think this trade is fair and shouldn't be questioned at all. I don't even know if I would do it substituting Decker for Lloyd

[drnick5]

I don't see any problem with this trade personally. if I was the commish I'd put it through. thanks for your help with mine!

[Montana168]

Thanks for the help with mine.

I tend to run my leagues, and I am a part of leagues, where the veto has been used maybe once or twice in a 4 year span. Therefore, this is not one of those that I would veto. While the trade is certainly lopsided in favor of Foster, I can see an owner that still believes in Mathews as a 1st round RB, and that needs a WR and sees Lloyd at his draft value. I think Decker is a massive upgrade over lloyd in the deal, and if push comes to shove and the commish should have no qualms with decker/mathews for foster. If he does, then your commish is way too strict. Good luck.

[tracyjesq]

I don't see what's to veto here. Take the kicker out if that's the issue. But the 3 for 1 trade is fair. I'm not sure I would do it if I were you. You're giving up so much for Foster. I get it - he's a beast but you're giving up 3 solid weekly starters. I guess it's hard to say definitively without seeing your whole team.

Thanks for the help with mine!

[jm1llz]

Thanks for the help!!

I dont see an issue with it. Youre giving up 3 who have the ability to start in anyones line up for foster. Gonzo is the top TE in a pass first offense,