Trade evaluation - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Draft, Trade, & Waiver Questions

Trade evaluation

Moderator: Football Moderators

Trade evaluation

Postby ergofrog22 » Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:45 pm

Well, I have been offered a trade which is being questioned by the commish as whether it should be vetoed:

I get:
A Foster HOU RB
Cook TEN TE
Nugent CIN K

I give:
Lloyd NE WR
Matthews SD RB
Gonzo ATL TE

The other team has been struggling with depth and I want to upgrade at RB. I could also swapp Decker DEN WR for Lloyd.
ergofrog22
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 29
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby sledge4 » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:07 pm

Overall your trade partner is getting the most value across the board. The commish is probably concerned because of the kicker being involved since kickers are generally a dime-a-dozen.

You could probably just to Foster for Lloyd/Mathews.
sledge4
Cheerleader
Cheerleader


Posts: 19
(Past Year: 1)
Joined: 22 May 2012
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby woowoo crew » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:21 pm

i disagree with above: you can't get foster for lloyd and mathews.

i don't see a problem with it. tony gonzalez has been best TE in the league. so you're giving the best TE, a solid RB, and a decent WR for the most talented RB in the league. (well peterson might be most talented) anyway, i think it's fair.
PPR for QB, RB, WR; 1 pt. per 10 yds.; 6 pt. TD; 1 pt. per 15 return yds.
QB: Rodgers, Stafford
RB: McCoy, Foster
WR: Cobb, Cruz
TE: Bennett
W/R: Spiller
Bench: Edelman, Gordon, Garcon, Gronk, SJax, Fitzpatrick, Woodhead
woowoo crew
Head Coach
Head Coach

Response Team
Posts: 1778
(Past Year: 89)
Joined: 27 Oct 2007
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby Whoop-On-U » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:32 pm

I don't see the issue here. You're basically trading Lloyd, Mathews, and Gonzo for Foster. You're giving up more than enough.
Whoop-On-U
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 212
(Past Year: 16)
Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby feldspar » Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:52 pm

I agree with Whoop. This is essentially a 3-for-1 trade. I like Foster, but he's not worth 3 solid roster spots.
feldspar
Cheerleader
Cheerleader


Posts: 14
Joined: 21 Mar 2011
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby macmillanben1 » Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:04 pm

I think this trade is fair and shouldn't be questioned at all. I don't even know if I would do it substituting Decker for Lloyd
macmillanben1
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 49
(Past Year: 4)
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby drnick5 » Wed Nov 14, 2012 4:12 pm

I don't see any problem with this trade personally. if I was the commish I'd put it through. thanks for your help with mine!
drnick5
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 278
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby Montana168 » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:13 pm

Thanks for the help with mine.

I tend to run my leagues, and I am a part of leagues, where the veto has been used maybe once or twice in a 4 year span. Therefore, this is not one of those that I would veto. While the trade is certainly lopsided in favor of Foster, I can see an owner that still believes in Mathews as a 1st round RB, and that needs a WR and sees Lloyd at his draft value. I think Decker is a massive upgrade over lloyd in the deal, and if push comes to shove and the commish should have no qualms with decker/mathews for foster. If he does, then your commish is way too strict. Good luck.
Image
Montana168
Defensive Assistant
Defensive Assistant


Posts: 371
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby tracyjesq » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:26 pm

I don't see what's to veto here. Take the kicker out if that's the issue. But the 3 for 1 trade is fair. I'm not sure I would do it if I were you. You're giving up so much for Foster. I get it - he's a beast but you're giving up 3 solid weekly starters. I guess it's hard to say definitively without seeing your whole team.

Thanks for the help with mine!
tracyjesq
Defensive Assistant
Defensive Assistant


Posts: 391
(Past Year: 16)
Joined: 1 Sep 2007
Home Cafe: Football

Re: Trade evaluation

Postby jm1llz » Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:30 pm

Thanks for the help!!

I dont see an issue with it. Youre giving up 3 who have the ability to start in anyones line up for foster. Gonzo is the top TE in a pass first offense,
My team:
Rodgers
Wallace, A. Johnson, D. Moore, D. Alexander
Morris, Reece, DMC, Murray, Wells, B. Brown, Hillman
Gates
Bryant
Seattle,
jm1llz
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 120
(Past Year: 2)
Joined: 20 Sep 2012
Home Cafe: Football

Next

Return to Draft, Trade, & Waiver Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 8:00 hours
(and 41 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact