Thanks for your help with mine.
QB
Don't underestimate what you saw in the Superdome vs. ATL last week from NO's pass D. Credit Vitt, credit a couple wins, whatever. Point is, they are no longer the "worst defense in the history of the league" (technically they never were - look up the Buccs from the '70s: YOWZA!

). Brady is the one to start. Palmer is an over-thinking move (I've made my fair share of those. One cost me my week last Sunday). I've been saying this: NE vs IND will be a shootout between Brady and Luck. The winner will be their fantasy owners who start them.
RB
It's a no-brainer: Leshoure. Jennings is (knock on wood) thus-far worthless, especially compared to the expectations that surrounded him when MJD went down (take it from an MJD owner). Jennings may get targeted a whee bit more in the passing game, but that's not enough to compensate for his ineptitude in the backfield. On top of that, they're going up against HOU? No, no, no, no, N O . The only RB's I'd start Jennings over this week are Adrian Peterson, your buddy Beast Mode, and CJ2K. And even THAT is just barely! Start Mikell.
WR
1) Moore
2) Wallace
3) Jackson
in that order. Foles will have to throw the ball for PHI to have a chance. Reid considering Foles for weeks before the Vick injury tells me he can't be completely inept. On the other hand, Reid NOT starting him over Vick during that span may PRECISELY speak to his complete ineptitude. Okay, let me revise this:
1) Moore
2) Wallace
3) Jones
Yep. Sit Desaun. I agree. Yah, it's PPR, but the whole Foles situation is just too volatile. Some say Foles' tendency to drop back and throw it will help an offensive line that's been overtaxed trying to take care of a scrambling Vick who extended plays. I don't know about that; I didn't see Vick checking stock options in the pocket. Not much time for much of that. In fact, not much time to take three steps, from what my eyes saw. Give the Foles situation a week to get sorted out. I agree with you: sit DJax.
On a final note,
the word of the day is "inept"
