WR Help Needed- Playing For Championship

[jaguiar88]

I'm playing for all the marbles and need WR help. I'm playing the team that has Brees so I was thinking of using Moore as one of the three WR.

Pick Three-

Mike Wallace
Cecil Shorts
Amendola
Lance Moore

Yahoo Standard scoring PPR 12 man Head to Head League.

[Indibuck]

I'm playing for all the marbles and need WR help. I'm playing the team that has Brees so I was thinking of using Moore as one of the three WR.

Pick Three-

Mike Wallace
Cecil Shorts
Amendola
Lance Moore

Yahoo Standard scoring PPR 12 man Head to Head League.

Give me Wallace, Shorts, and Amendola... I understand your thinking, but I see more consistency and upside with the other 3.

Thanks for the help with mine.

[oe14203]

I like where your heads at w the Moore pick. I'd also go with Cecil and Danny boy. I don't like Wallace, even w Big Ben back. Cinci has a very underrated def and they are playing for playoffs

Help here
http://www.fantasyfootballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=532717

[snixx79]

In PPR I like Wallace/Shorts/Amendola. Danny has an upside of 15 receptions. Moore is hit or miss, high risk/reward.
Good luck!


Help?
viewtopic.php?t=532718

[prophecy135]

I'm playing for all the marbles and need WR help. I'm playing the team that has Brees so I was thinking of using Moore as one of the three WR.

Pick Three-

Mike Wallace
Cecil Shorts
Amendola
Lance Moore

Yahoo Standard scoring PPR 12 man Head to Head League.

its tempting to try and minimize Brees, but I think your better off just playing your best options which would be Wallace, Shorts and Amendola. Wallace is getting targeted heavily still and yes Cincy's D has been playing really well, but I still think Wallace will get his targets. Amendola should get a load of targets against a terrible TB secondary, and Shorts and the Jags should be playing from behind and throwing a lot.

help with mine?
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=532722

[Cheesypoofs73]

YES
#1 Amendola (Bradford coming off big game, going against TB, FINALLY healthy!)
#2 Shorts (Aerial assault with New England, NE has weak secondary, plus passing a lot to catch up to Brady)
#3 Moore

NO
Wallace (Cincinnati D has just been consistently a beast as of late!


Help me!
viewtopic.php?t=532725

[jaguiar88]

.

[DAtaris17]

It's between Wallace and Moore. I'm going to say play Wallace, more on the line and Moore's targets are scarily inconsistent at times. Start: Shorts, Amendola, Wallace. Bench: Moore.

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=532832

[toobitter]

i like amendola and shorts for the consistency play and wallace as the home run threat. moore could have a decent game, but wallace is capable of a total matchup swing.

thanks for the help on mine.

[Game]

Wallace, Shorts, and Amendola are your best bets.