m16a wrote:Great work as always, stever. Thanks for your contributions. Interested to hear your rationale behind your exclusion of DeSean Jackson? Obviously I'm a bit biased, but I'd think he's at LEAST in the top 100 guys for the next 3 years?
Thank you. DeSean Jackson just missed the cut. One reason is his size. I do not see him staying healthy with the additional targets in Chip Kelly's offense. During the past three years, Jackson has missed eight games. I also don't think he will go over 65-70 receptions, which hurts his value in one-point-per-reception leagues. He hit 62 receptions during his first two seasons, but he has failed to go over 60 since then. Injures played a role in that though. WIth that said, I can see the argument for DeSean Jackson in the top 100. Chip Kelly likes to run, which could help DeSean Jackson get open down the field. In addition, he is an explosive playmaker. Jackson would be in my top 105.