CBSSportsline - 2004 Cheet Sheet

[recmccl]

Here's some more FYI for you all. I thought the cheet sheets was pretty good. I just don't see Vick #1 though.


http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/fantasy/story

[Shatner8]

I dont agree with Vick ther either, id have Cpepp and Manning over him

[Transmogrifier]

What about Boldin over Chad Johnson? That's crazy.

[M_Zimm_ffc]

There is no way I would use that cheat sheet. I know it is early and nobody will but Vick over Manning and Culpepper? Vick did not even do that great when he was back this year. I also agree with Transmo, Boldin over CJ? I honestly think that CJ is going to be better than Holt next year. I also think that there is no way Boldin will get anywhere near as many yards because the Cards as a team will be better next year. A ton of Boldin's yards came in the 4th qaurter of games where Ds were in prevent defense and giving up a bunch of short-yardage passes. Boldin almost eveyr game would do next to nothing in the first half and then had great stats in the second half. I think Shipp will do much better next year and that will hurt Boldin's stats.

[M_Zimm_ffc]

One other thing, how can they rank Stephen Jackson that high? They have no idea where he will end up and then have him that high? How do they know he won't end up like LJ last year, behind a great back and doing nothing? I don't agree with a lot of things in that sheet, I guess that's why we don't draft this early.

[Free Bagel]

See, rankings by position seem like kind of a waste to me.

Most people can figure out whether they'd rather have Shaun Alexander or Fred Taylor.

Whether they'd rather have Fred Taylor or Randy Moss is a completely different story...

[Poobah]

Dang, where to start...

1) How can Vick be the #1 QB when neither Peerless Price nor Brian Finneran is projected for a huge jump? 20 rushing TD?

2) Two Cleveland RB in the top 32? I dinna think so

3) He was awfully modest on Willis McGahee to drop Travis Henry a few notches, wasn't he?

4) Are Curtis Martin, Eddie George, and Jerome Bettis ever gonna drop below their backups? Any of them

5) Was Emmitt Smith at #60 a respect nod or a dig at Cowboys fans?

6) And if, and only if, I believe that he has gotten a feel for where the rookies are gonna place, how can he completely ignore Larry Fitzgerald?

[KingGhidra]

QBs: Plummer too low, Bledsoe too high.

RBs: Garner & Green too high, Bennett too low.

WRs: Boldin, S. Moss, K-Rob, Plax too high.

TEs: Franks & Gates too low.

[Shatner8]

Boldin is too high, S. Moss is too low IMO

R.Smith is too high as is S.Smith

[bungle613]

more problems...

1) Bulger and Warner at 14 and 17.

2) Delhomme too low.

3) Garner the 18th best back???

4) Boldin will not be the 6th best WR next year!

5) Chambers and A. JOhnson are a little low.

6) Yes, Pollard and Clark will both get more pointsd than Witten or Jolley even splitting catches and 4 WR's of quality on Indy. No chance.

And surprisingly... I agree with almost everyone else's statements. Bad cheat sheet.