I also have to go with Indy, but I might also include the trio from San Diego:
LaDainian, LaDainian, LaDainian
(actually I just wish SD had a receiving trio to speak of... maybe then they would win more than 4)
awwchrist wrote:granted Krob didn't have the year everyone expected him to..but Jackson came through once again..
And it's apparent you didn't see Engram play this season otherwise you'd rethink your Chrebet statement. Engram is absolutely the best 3WR in the game.
I love Engram. He was the most consistent WR they had for a stretch of several weeks. However D-Jax & K-Rob don't add up to the 1-2 punch of some of the elite WR duos, so there's no way Engram brings THAT much to the table. They have the potential to, but they don't.
Here's some of the trios you mentioned, along with Seattle (who apparently DOES belong there)
Cleveland: 1821 yds, 10TDs
Wash: 2164 yards 17 TDs
Dallas: 2176 yds 11 TDs (Included a full season of Keyshawn numbers and dropped Galloway)
Pitt: 2387 yards 15 TDs
Jets: 2431 20TDs (included a full season of your boy Chrebet all 513 yards and 2 TDs and dropped Conway for McCaerins' numbers)
Indy: 2651 yards, 20 TDs (dropped stokley for Pollard since rec #'s were in TE favor)
Seattle: 2670 yards, 19 TDs
STL: 3172 yards 20 TDs
________________________________________
26-13
Only 3 leagues this year. No sense in rooting for everyone in the NFL.
Shatner8 wrote:Another Trio worth a look is the Bengals with Johnson, Warrick and Washington, i think they could easily be the top trio in a few years. Also, with the recent signing of Marcus Robinson. Moss/Robinson/Bates could be great also
Well I like the Colts trio. Can't beat that one. And the Vikings shouldn't really be mentioned cause this is trio talk not indivual talk. Moss is great but his supporting cast aint all that good. And when evaluating receivers you have to look at this years potential not what they did last year. Thats just dumb as things and systems change. To put in Keyshawn's numbers from last year to prove a point is DUMB. Keyshawn has a much more defined role and will get the ball more. Which in turn will open up the field for the other receivers. I think the Cowboys receivers compliment each other more than any other trio in the league. They all do their thing and bring different skills to the table. Too bad they have Q throwing them the ball.
I don't know if the whole idea of trio is explained very well. To many variables have to be considered. In search of the absoulute best trio ( meaning three people that work together for one cause). It would be Pitts and Stl more than likely neck and neck. Here is why.
PLease remeber this was a quick visual calculation from the last three years and doesn't inclued trades,waives,or resignings. Just the teams system.
Anyways why I say this is in both cases Pitts and Stl have had there top 2 recievers in the top thirty of all wr's for the last three years. both buress and Ward for pitt which in the last two years was complemented by Randle El. Also Bruce and Holt but there #3 guy has changed but still was noticed and locker is in a good Prohle mold. You might also include Oak with Rice and Brown being the top two then complemented by Porter for the last two years then Garner the year prior.
To inclued Ind is this group or even Minn would not quit work since these teams rely on one wr to perform and the others get a toss when the main wr is tied up. Sea is become a triple threat but has not had the yards prior to last year to be a proven trio.
One might be looking for what is to come more that what has happened in the past. For what I see it is all by what you have done as a team (trio) to be called the best.
All and all the only good dynamic trio included a girl in tight spandex calling herself a bat.
awwchrist wrote:granted Krob didn't have the year everyone expected him to..but Jackson came through once again..
And it's apparent you didn't see Engram play this season otherwise you'd rethink your Chrebet statement. Engram is absolutely the best 3WR in the game.
I love Engram. He was the most consistent WR they had for a stretch of several weeks. However D-Jax & K-Rob don't add up to the 1-2 punch of some of the elite WR duos, so there's no way Engram brings THAT much to the table. They have the potential to, but they don't.
Here's some of the trios you mentioned, along with Seattle (who apparently DOES belong there)
Cleveland: 1821 yds, 10TDs
Wash: 2164 yards 17 TDs
Dallas: 2176 yds 11 TDs (Included a full season of Keyshawn numbers and dropped Galloway)
Pitt: 2387 yards 15 TDs
Jets: 2431 20TDs (included a full season of your boy Chrebet all 513 yards and 2 TDs and dropped Conway for McCaerins' numbers)
Indy: 2651 yards, 20 TDs (dropped stokley for Pollard since rec #'s were in TE favor)
Seattle: 2670 yards, 19 TDs
STL: 3172 yards 20 TDs
good job AwwC
Canadian Seahawk
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 5422
Joined: 6 Feb 2003
Yards this season: 0
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Toronto, Centre of the Universe.,,I'd love some M&Ms please homeless