Ricky and Deuce

[Dazedncnfz]

Well he definitely said "behind" twice by accident. I think it makes more sense that the mistaken behind was the second one, so that it read "we all have Ricky behind Deuce, never in front of him," because, well, we all, and just about every mock and ranking out there, has Ricky behind Deuce. It wouldn't make much sense to say "we all have Ricky in front of Deuce" when almost no one does...

Not to mention, he's already said in this very thread a few posts up:

I'm not saying Deuce should be ranked behind Ricky

he may not be saying in this part of the sentence you quoted, but was he is indicating is that Ricky is the better back to have, which I disagree with...ranking Deuce ar 3-4 freaks him out...and he doesn't believe in 5....Deuce is a top 3 back coming into this year...no doubt about it...so 3-4 is just fine and 5 would be the lowest he should be ranked....IMO

[NittanyLions]

No I wasnt indicating he was the better back actually, but I was indicating you have little reason to put deuce at 3-4 and then Ricky at 7-8. I can understand #5. I just want to know your reasoning behind this, and how is he behind Portis who is a junior and is doing GREAT and is behind an O-line who had an off year, but held Davis on its shoulder, and ahead of Ahman, who has been on fire.

[Big Pimpin']

HOLY CRAP, i'm confused. even the explinations of what he said had typos and that confused me even more. i was under the impression he meant that deuce is ahead of ricky. if that isn't what he meant then i have to re-read the whole thread again.