Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

by **aussieboy** » Sun May 16, 2004 11:55 pm

VHawk15 wrote:
r_singh_02 wrote:i agree wit u 100% guest. for the last 2 weeks or so, every1 has been marking Deuce OVERRATED and not a STUD.

I don't think anyone said that McAllister wasn't a stud, and I challenge you to find someone that did say that. What some people were suggesting was that Deuce didn't warrant a top 5 pick because of his TD inconsistency last season.

Exactly. Duece's consistency in terms of yards is great. If his TD numbers lifted that to those of Priest, LT, Holmes or Portis then maybe he could be talked about has a top 4 pick.

by **Azrael** » Mon May 17, 2004 12:04 am

I make a proposal that we disregard any hyping of or whining about a player from someone who is a fan of that team. I'm tired of seeing posts like this where people complain about "this guy should be ranked higher" or "why's everybody hating on so and so" and what they say makes absolutely no sense because of their obvious bias.

I mean, it is about time the Saints realize the media has been holding them down, get mad, and go out there and win the superbowl like everyone knows they can. Once Deuce sees he's only 5th in all the fantasy mags this summer, hoo boy , look out.

by **aussieboy** » Mon May 17, 2004 12:24 am

Once Deuce sees he's only 5th in all the fantasy mags this summer, hoo boy , look out.

Apparently Priest last year advised everyone to take him first in Fantasy drafts.

I realise he isn't gonna exactly say: "Well i'm probably just outside the top 4, its my age that people should be worried about"

It's still cool though.

by **awwchrist** » Mon May 17, 2004 1:30 am

http://www.fantasyfootballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=60624

Only 12 treads down.

by **9er Fan** » Mon May 17, 2004 12:48 pm

Why is everybody down on Deuce??

Because he only had 8 TDs last year. I'd put Priest, LT, Green, Portis, Lewis and Alexander ahead of him.

by **9er Fan** » Mon May 17, 2004 12:50 pm

smackthefirst wrote:You hit it right on Flux. Theres the top 2 this year and then a lgo jam at 3-8. An argument can probably be made for and against every running back sitting on peoples boards between 3-8.

Some people are even throwing Edge into this lu,ping, but ive got him sitting solid at 9.

I think you'd have a hard time making a case that Green belongs at #8.

by **smackthefirst** » Mon May 17, 2004 1:01 pm

Ok. You got me. I mis spoke/typed??. Yes no one is gonna argue Green is the number 8 back. I was more going how each guy has his own positives and negatives, which is why there is so much debate.

I can more see guys swinging up or down two-three spots depending on whose ranking them. Thats what I meant by saying a logjam.