CKY_ROX wrote:i used to do that when i was a lil opster becasue i thought it was cool to have a high opst count. but now im starting to try to put mor time into the posts and put at leaft a cuople scentences saying why, unless someone has hit the nail on the head, then i might give i a il Yup, or You covered it all, i agree
Note to CKY_ROX: Please either slow down your typing or use spell check. I know my spelling isn't always perfect but your posts are getting nearly impossible to read. If this post is an example of trying "to put more time into the posts..." you are in trouble!
Ease up you guys, I don't particularly enjoy these posts, but you're talking about people as if they are stupid just because they don't give a long-winded answer. I would rather read a proper explanation but you can't really police this type of posting.
I ain't no suit-wearin' businessman like you... you know I'm just a gangsta I suppose... - Avon Barksdale
Canadian_Cheesehead wrote:Ease up you guys, I don't particularly enjoy these posts, but you're talking about people as if they are stupid just because they don't give a long-winded answer. I would rather read a proper explanation but you can't really police this type of posting.
yea what he said.
seriously, altho theyre not my favorite posts to read, if im asking a question as to who to draft or whether to make a trade or not, i dont mind seeing one person give a nice explanation and then have a bunch of ppl just agree to it. thats cool, i know that its the general consesus. Altho i do see where you guys are coming from, i dont think it should be a problem.
CKY_ROX wrote:i used to do that when i was a lil opster becasue i thought it was cool to have a high opst count. but now im starting to try to put mor time into the posts and put at leaft a cuople scentences saying why, unless someone has hit the nail on the head, then i might give i a il Yup, or You covered it all, i agree
Note to CKY_ROX: Please either slow down your typing or use spell check. I know my spelling isn't always perfect but your posts are getting nearly impossible to read. If this post is an example of trying "to put more time into the posts..." you are in trouble!
alright, thanks for the heads up, im trying to fast for some posts and i will try to improve my spelling, sorry to all of you that had to decyfer(SP) my posts and i will try to improve the spelling. sorry all
CKY_ROX wrote:i used to do that when i was a lil opster becasue i thought it was cool to have a high opst count. but now im starting to try to put mor time into the posts and put at leaft a cuople scentences saying why, unless someone has hit the nail on the head, then i might give i a il Yup, or You covered it all, i agree
Note to CKY_ROX: Please either slow down your typing or use spell check. I know my spelling isn't always perfect but your posts are getting nearly impossible to read. If this post is an example of trying "to put more time into the posts..." you are in trouble!
alright, thanks for the heads up, im trying to fast for some posts and i will try to improve my spelling, sorry to all of you that had to decyfer(SP) my posts and i will try to improve the spelling. sorry all
That's cool!!! Thanks!
Last edited by Carolina Culpepper on Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Carolina Culpepper wrote:Note to CKY_ROX: Please either slow down your typing or use spell check. I know my spelling isn't always perfect but your posts are getting nearly impossible to read. If this post is an example of trying "to put more time into the posts..." you are in trouble!
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe
Carolina Culpepper wrote:Note to CKY_ROX: Please either slow down your typing or use spell check. I know my spelling isn't always perfect but your posts are getting nearly impossible to read. If this post is an example of trying "to put more time into the posts..." you are in trouble!
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe
i have sen that to and it is really cool. i assume taht most of my posts are legable becasue of this amazing research. ROAR
Carolina Culpepper wrote:Note to CKY_ROX: Please either slow down your typing or use spell check. I know my spelling isn't always perfect but your posts are getting nearly impossible to read. If this post is an example of trying "to put more time into the posts..." you are in trouble!
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe
i have sen that to and it is really cool. i assume taht most of my posts are legable becasue of this amazing research. ROAR
TTTBone wrote:I love horable spelling.
As far as posting, I gotta agree with Nittany. Sometimes a guy is looking for a consensus, and if my opinion matches a previous posters, I think it's okay to say "... this guy got it right", in order to buttress the argument of the guy you agree with against those of others. However, if it's not a question where the initial poster is looking for advice, then I see no reason to post redundantly, cuz, you know, that's just, like... lame, and stuff.
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
-Benjamin Franklin