Any of these good enough to be WR3 regulars?

[Bo Jackson]

I am planning to trade my WR2 and WR3 for a stud WR1.. but I am wondering if Branch, Lloyd, or Ferguson are fit for the job as a WR3

[Daddymike59]

NO. All are in piss poor situations except Ferg who is the 3rd recv in GB. Ya never know who is going to get the ball in NE and Lloyd is in SF where ther is no QB

[Azrael]

I wouldn't want any of them as my third WR. Lloyd would be the only one I would even consider having on my roster.

[Bo Jackson]

so s. smith, j. smith, porter is better than harrison, s. smith, and one of those 3?

[VHawk15]

I wouldn't want any of them as my third WR. Lloyd would be the only one I would even consider having on my roster.

Agreed. Lloyd could make a nice #4 WR.

[MadScott]

You would be taking a gamble for sure.

Lloyd--Could be a potential #1 but no one knows what that will mean in SF this year. Could be 60-800-4TDs.

Branch--NE does spread the ball around rather liberally so there is no clear cut choice there. Should better last years #s, but I wouldn't think by much.

Ferguson--There's some articles that I've read that suggest that he could be the guy in GB if he didn't have as many special teams assignments as he does. That being said, if they aren't gong to change that, there's no reason to think he's going to climb the charts anytime soon.

[Bowie]

so s. smith, j. smith, porter is better than harrison, s. smith, and one of those 3?

If you have room to take a couple of these guys to see who breaks out, I would rather have Harrison, S. Smith, and Fergusen with Branch on my bench. I think you should always take a star when you can especially at WR (there are always guys who break out, just keep an eye on the WW).

[Kensat30]

So the deal is Jimmy Smith + Porter for Harrison?

I'll take that deal every day of the week even if I have to use Wesley Walls as my #3 WR.

[IRON CHEF]

That deal is too good to pass up. Plug in Lloyd as your starter and hope Rattay can figure things out.