SwiperNoSwiping wrote:It's tough to tell sarcasm and cynicism through a post like this Menyak, and I felt yours contained both. I apologize for the name calling. I felt immediately that your response offered little help as that was something I had tried already. Perhaps pointing me to the answer directly would have helped more.
However it did get me to go through the rules again, so the answer did help. Although, I did feel it could have been written differently. I did feel the answer was very condescending in the least.
If you knew the answer, stating the rules 'might' help? come on. You took a tone with it and you knew it.
Swiper, you didn't say in your original post that you had read the rules. menyak's post told you that there were rules and he gave you a link to the rules. There are 12 paragraphs dealing with scoring how was he supposed to know with what you needed help?
Also, Zimm asked the same question on page 2 of this thread and by Osk on this very page, so it is not a stretch for him to think that you did not read the rules or bother checking the other posts.
You've gotta take it easy on the guy when he suggests that you read the rules and give you a wink emoticon.