Has Booker's value gone up or down?

[nomadic_stranger]

Great opinions... I gotta like the fact that Chambers will see some double teams, and Booker should be man-to-man a lot. I don't like anything about Miami's offense, or his being able to adjust to the Buffalo-like turmoil they will be suffering through. Granted, I can see them playing from behind a lot. I'm putting him in my lower-tier breakout WRs to take rds 7-9(Booker, Gage, DBranch, etc) (Uppet-tier breakouts I'm taking in rds 5-7 are DStallworth, JMcCareins, LFitz) I'll keep Booker, I suppose, but he's depth right now. Anybody else have some thoughts?

[MadScott]

Truthfully, on talent and the fact that he's produced before, I think you should put him in that upper tier of breakout WRs this year. I think it's going to take some time to assimilate the playbook which I don't like but don't forget, this is a new offense for everyone as Norvelle is no longer heading up their offense this year.

[Canacuna]

I was pretty high on Booker before this deal went down - mostly because I think that Rex Grossman will focus on him like he did in the final month of last season. Maybe not a full revert back to his 100 catch/1,000 yard days, but somewhere in that neighborhood (as I'm still expecting the Bears to really suck).

Anyway, I think that Marty Booker is actually a better player than Chris Chambers, so once he shows that he's grasped the playbook, defenses will be keying in on him rather than Chambers.

...but I dunno... I still think that he has good potential. He's easily still a very solid #3 and a great guy to have on your bench. I thought he had potential to be a decent #2 WR, but now I don't know about that...