Monty, I think you should be tossed out of the Cafe just for being a Bills fan, but your posts are too damn amusing.
I think a real sleeper this year who could have the best rookie receiver #s is Devery Henderson of the Saints. Once Dainty Stallworth snags her nylon warming up she'll be out for the season and Henderson with his blazing speed and big play potential he could be a real threat both as a WR and return man.
I think, therefore I am. I think fantasy, therefore I am unreal?
moochman
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 16215
(Past Year: 847)
Joined: 20 Jul 2003
Yards this season: 568
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Living in the shame only a Lions fan knows
tanner wrote:haven't heard anyone mention Michael Clayton in TB...or Watts in Denver..have you all seen just HOW BAD Lelie looks?!?! rod smith is like 1,345 yers old, he's got to be slowing down at some point, not unlike Tim Brown... Watts has looked incredible so far...and in that offense, BOTH starting WR's have caught over 80 balls in the past ( McCaffrey & Smith)
give Watts a look!!!
I think these are two good possibilities. You already covered Watts, so I won't. If McCardell doesn't return to the Bucs, Clayton will probably start opposite Galloway. Gruden loves to get the ball to big receivers over the middle and with Galloway being more of an outside, deep threat I think Clayton will get a lot of balls.
Lelie continues to dispoint and Rod Smith is getting older by the second. I like Watts to impress in Denver.
The obvious choices are Roy Williams and Fitzgerald, but the sleeper I like is Devard Darling in Baltimore. He's raw, but very determined and has a lot of upside.
Watch out for Devery Henderson in New Orleans, too.
I like Reggie Willliams of Jacksonville, but just can't see Boldin-type numbers from him. If Jimmy Smith plays like his age (isn't he 35?), then Reggie could step in and be a go-to guy on passing for the Jaguars.
Of course, Fitzgerald and Roy Williams (if Charles Rogers goes down) can also possibly succed in similar fashion to Boldin, but isn't that obvious?