hardcore wrote:Cornbread Maxwell wrote:hardcore wrote:Never proven he can carry a load....Well that's not a fair assesment. He never had a chance with Hearst in there. Last year in last few games, Barlow proved he could carry the rock and produce when given the chance. Barlow is a much much better back than Westbrook, who(surpise surprise) broke down last year just like he will this year. A 205 lb RB in the NFC East. Do u really think he will last? I think it's pretty funny that people would rank Westbrook with Barlow. Hell, I thinks it's funny that the cheatsheets have him rated below Faulk,Henry,and DD. SF's O-line is good and SF will surprise a few people. People were dawging the Detroit Tigers and their FF players and they have been some of the best. This looks eerily similar. SF will finish 2nd in the NFC west cuz St.Loius and Arizona will stink ... Hell that's 4 games alone where Barlow will outproduce half of everyone's conventional top 10 Rb list.
Nope. Do u want to wager? You will lose ..Barlow will be top 10 easily .However, your boy Westbrook-well he won't even make it through the season. Barlow will dust him in stats.
I'll take you up on that bet. Barlow's stats from last year (around 5 ypc) were inflated because of A.) To Garcia scaring D and B) situational runs when Hearst got the goaline carries. Barlow will not make top 10 RBs this year. However, I don't think Wesbrook is much better, but like how Cornbread said, I would rather have Westbrook early 3rd then Barlow late 2nd...