Who has more potential? - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Football Talk

Who has more potential?

Moderator: Football Moderators

Who has more potential?

Postby AGENT » Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:36 pm

I am deciding between these two grou0 of guys and Suggs is the main factor in this choice.

L Tomlinson and Suggs
or
T Holt and D Staley

I already have K Jones, E James, and T Jones at RB.
Image
AGENT
Defensive Assistant
Defensive Assistant

User avatar

Posts: 509
Joined: 6 Jun 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Cheering on the Black and Gold

Postby TTTBone » Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:42 pm

With the RBs you already have, Holt is tempting, but you gotta go with LT2 and Suggs. You really need that solid top5 RB stud. You can then package two of your lesser backs for a top 5 WR.
Image
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."
-Benjamin Franklin
TTTBone
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Cafe RankerPick 3 Weekly WinnerSweet 16 SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 4481
(Past Year: 8)
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Home Cafe: Football

Postby Free Bagel » Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:46 pm

TTTBone wrote:With the RBs you already have, Holt is tempting, but you gotta go with LT2 and Suggs. You really need that solid top5 RB stud. You can then package two of your lesser backs for a top 5 WR.


I agree. Holt and Staley don't even compare to LT2 and Suggs.
Image
Free Bagel
Mod in Retirement
Mod in Retirement

User avatar
CafeholicFantasy ExpertMock(ing) DrafterCafe Musketeer
Posts: 8495
Joined: 25 Jul 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Titletown, FL

Postby EatMyShorts092 » Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:49 pm

who r ur wr's....either way i say go lt and suggs, u can always trade one of suggs,kj or even edge for a better wr but this is LT we're talking about.
EatMyShorts092
Defensive Assistant
Defensive Assistant

User avatar

Posts: 583
Joined: 3 Aug 2003
Home Cafe: Football

Postby Free Bagel » Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:52 pm

Think of it like this. Suggs and Staley are just about a wash in terms of draft value.

LT on the other hand, is worth any WR out there. Even if, let's say, you are completely satisfied with your RB's, and don't like LT to do well this year. You could trade LT for any WR out there, namely one Randy Moss, and probably get them to throw something else in as well.

So, even if you have no intentions of keeping LT, you're looking at Moss+Suggs+someone else vs. Holt+Staley.
Image
Free Bagel
Mod in Retirement
Mod in Retirement

User avatar
CafeholicFantasy ExpertMock(ing) DrafterCafe Musketeer
Posts: 8495
Joined: 25 Jul 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Titletown, FL

Postby Johnny Ballgame » Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:54 pm

Bro - I don't care if it's LT and KiJanna Carter - you gotta keep LT! You have a RB lineup of LT2 and Edge - fall to you knees and thank the heavens my friend. That will make up for any WR deficiency you have. Besides - someone on here mentioned you can package a couple of the lower tier RB's for a good receiver, especially once the season starts.
"You using the whole fist there doc?" - Irwin M. Fletcher
Johnny Ballgame
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff

User avatar

Posts: 179
Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: In the end zone of Soldier Field!

Postby Nobodies Business » Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:54 pm

no no no.... You go for Holt... Edge and Staley are great especialy with T jones as #3, and I predict by week 3 you might wanna start Jones, so with so much depth at RB it would just be a waste to get another one.. And you pick up one of THE BEST wide outs... It makes your team better....

So many people are overlooking staley in pitsburgh this season, and I cant figure out why... He has the job all to himself, and he has the skills to pay the bills.. and its not even like he's not proven, he showed how good he was in Philly... Staley is more than a solid #2..... Even Thomas Jones has looked like Ahman Green Ver. 2.0 in preseason in chicago.. You would have 3 very solid RBs, even if they are way under the radar...
Last edited by Nobodies Business on Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nobodies Business
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 118
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: chicago

Postby tman570 » Mon Aug 30, 2004 4:55 pm

I agree, LT is the 2nd best or best player in FF period. This is a no brainer, you gotta go with LT! ;-D
Image
tman570
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar

Posts: 766
Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Home Cafe: Football

Postby SidelineQB » Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:12 pm

nothing to think about here. get lt2 and you will own your league with the rbs you have.
SidelineQB
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 54
Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: T dot

Postby SidelineQB » Mon Aug 30, 2004 5:16 pm

nothing to think about here. get lt2 and you will own your league with the rbs you have.
SidelineQB
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 54
Joined: 30 Nov 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: T dot

Next

Return to Football Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 1:31 hours
(and 36 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact