json929 wrote:1st and goal on the 3 and they pass it 3 times in a row.
Now what sense does that make when you have a beast like Barlow?
This is really where they screwed up. I have no idea what they are thinking. They got down close again and did the same thing. Apparently they didn't realize they had 3 time outs and had the ability to run and not lose time. If the play calling from my Niners is going to be this bad all year, I might as well just not even pay attention.
On to Barlow. I have him in one league. He got one point. They are not using him enough or else they can't get him holes to run through. All I can say is thank God I traded for Griffin because I have a feeling Barlow will be riding the pine if Griffin plays well.
The One, the Only, the Incomparable Mercer Boy. My My YouTube.
Anyone who has seen my anti-Barlow posts should be forwarned... he will have some big games, but not on a regular enuff basis to warrant him as a #2 RB. San Fran is in for a LONG season y'all... at least Dorsey will get his live reps now.
GMoney wrote:lets hate on all the REAL flops this week please.....
Yeah, McCallister was crap this weekend. You expect your #1 back to at least put up something in the 8 pt. range for crying out loud. Barlow will end up being a very fine #2 by year end.
I like simple pleasures, like butter in my ass, lollipops in my mouth. That's just me.
i dont know why anyone thought Barlow was going to be good on such a bad offense. Anyone that has a clue about fantasy football knows you stay away from RB's on bad offenses, only exception being Ladanian since hes probablly the best RB in football who can overcome bad support. I thought it was funny when i opened up this years guide and saw Barlow listed in the top tier of RB's.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by Favre.com » Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:05 pm 
[/url]
