Another Experts Draft

[Nero]

http://www.fantasyguru.com/fantasy-experts-draft.html

[hayesb26]

they called Stephen Davis a "value" in the first round?

[Nero]

I didn't say it was a good draft...just "another" one

[Indy Dragons]

IF nothing else, this draft should show you that RBs are in heavy demand!

16 of the first 18 picks were RBs!
20 of the first 23 picks were RBs!

[Nero]

Not a surprise to any of us I am sure

[Homeless]

Interesting strategies present.

I cant wait for draft day !!

[Indy Dragons]

Here is a question, which has been asked before, but this is a 'real-life' scenario, so I can actually show you, and see what we think.

Let's pretend in our in the 1.14 - 2.01 pick. Tom Kessenich of Fantasy Sports Magazine was in this position, and in the first four rounds he selected:
1.14 - Stephen Davis
2.01 - William Green
3.14 - David Boston
4.01 - T.J. Duckett

Now (looking back after the draft is over), I'm going to make a few changes to his draft picks, and here is what I may have done:
1.14 - Stephen Davis
2.01 - Terrell Owens
3.14 - David Boston
4.01 - Anthony Thomas


Which team do you like better after four picks? With the chance to start THREE RBs in this league, I may even think of switching out Boston for a RB (in my picks).

[9er Fan]

I'd love to see how this league plays out. Especially to see how Brandon Funston's team does:

Harrison
Owens
Shockey
Bettis
Pittman
McNair
Buckhalter
...

Can the RB trend be successfully bucked?

[Nero]

Don't get your hopes up...that team won't be bucking the RB trend

[Homeless]

Indy, I like your picks better, except Anthony Thomas.

9er, no way will that team buck the RB theory. I was surprised he took shockey 3rd.