Challie wrote:This brings up the age old question, should vetoes be used to protect FF idiots from hurting themselves? Or also to prevent teams from benefitting from others' stupidity?
Personally, I think a veto can & should be used in a case of extreme ripoffs, even if there's no collusion.
I disagree....FF is about matching your wits and knowledge against all the other owners in your league in an attempt to end up with the best team, soundly crush them all enroute to winning the league championship. Fair means playing by the rules (i.e. no collusion) and that includes making trades that benefit your team, hopefully more than it helps theirs. If there is a trade that is very lopsided then it is everyone's fault for allowing an unknowledgeable owner to join the league.
That said, it is still a legal trade and hats off to the guy who got it done. Everyone else just wishes it had been them (FF trade envy!). As long as there is no collusion in the mix, leave it alone.....its part of FF. There is no way all, or even most trades will be equal.