spodog wrote:This trade is not one you should Veto. It is not so lopsided that it will affect other owners.
I don't think the rosters of the two teams involved should be part of the evaluation of whether the trade is fair or not. They are not relevant for determining if the trade is fair.
Of course team's rosters matter. It seems like a prevelant idea in the cafe that for a trade to go through, both teams in the trade would have to have, at the least, an argument as to how the trade would help them. If you take away their rosters from the equasion, very few trades would be allowable. You may as well just look up a rankings list and add up the rankings of each team's players when evaluating a trade.
I am so smart. S-M-R-T