Should i veto this trade or is it fair?

[ljthockey]

Just a bad desicion on Team B. I would just stay out of it.

[spodog]

This trade is not one you should Veto. It is not so lopsided that it will affect other owners.

I don't think the rosters of the two teams involved should be part of the evaluation of whether the trade is fair or not. They are not relevant for determining if the trade is fair.

[Bowie]

This trade is not one you should Veto. It is not so lopsided that it will affect other owners.

I don't think the rosters of the two teams involved should be part of the evaluation of whether the trade is fair or not. They are not relevant for determining if the trade is fair.

Of course team's rosters matter. It seems like a prevelant idea in the cafe that for a trade to go through, both teams in the trade would have to have, at the least, an argument as to how the trade would help them. If you take away their rosters from the equasion, very few trades would be allowable. You may as well just look up a rankings list and add up the rankings of each team's players when evaluating a trade.

[Rattay to Lloyd]

I think this trade is OK. Either team could get the better of the deal in the end.

[no1cowboysfan]

to see my arguement pertaining to this issue, see the other post the same as this one...

oh, i could provide a link... but i wont. i wont... because you didnt take the time to see other posts before making another commisioner post.

short story shorter, don't veto.

[Mudd]

I don't think this trade is that one sided.

I would only veto in the case of collusion.

[jerzey jetz]

Is there something in it for you? Why would you veto it? If you do, you might as well manage the other 9 teams as well!

[Dominion]

Trade is fine.