Should i veto this trade or is it fair? - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Football Talk

Should i veto this trade or is it fair?

Moderator: Football Moderators

Postby ljthockey » Wed Oct 06, 2004 5:54 pm

Just a bad desicion on Team B. I would just stay out of it.
[b][color=red]You have just read a Ljthockey© post[/color][/b]

Image
ljthockey
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Cafe WriterMock(ing) DrafterEagle EyeSweet 16 Survivor
Posts: 4283
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Nebraska....?

no veto

Postby spodog » Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:01 pm

This trade is not one you should Veto. It is not so lopsided that it will affect other owners.

I don't think the rosters of the two teams involved should be part of the evaluation of whether the trade is fair or not. They are not relevant for determining if the trade is fair.
spodog
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Cafe WriterCafe RankerCafe SpotterWeb SupporterMatchup Meltdown SurvivorCafe Blackjack Weekly WinnerLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 4058
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: At my trailer on the beach in Malibu

Re: no veto

Postby Bowie » Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:07 pm

spodog wrote:This trade is not one you should Veto. It is not so lopsided that it will affect other owners.

I don't think the rosters of the two teams involved should be part of the evaluation of whether the trade is fair or not. They are not relevant for determining if the trade is fair.

Of course team's rosters matter. It seems like a prevelant idea in the cafe that for a trade to go through, both teams in the trade would have to have, at the least, an argument as to how the trade would help them. If you take away their rosters from the equasion, very few trades would be allowable. You may as well just look up a rankings list and add up the rankings of each team's players when evaluating a trade.
I am so smart. S-M-R-T
Bowie Beginner
Head Coach
Head Coach

User avatar

Posts: 1594
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Panama

Postby Rattay to Lloyd » Wed Oct 06, 2004 6:24 pm

I think this trade is OK. Either team could get the better of the deal in the end.
Rattay to Lloyd
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 44
Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Home Cafe: Football

Postby no1cowboysfan » Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:03 pm

to see my arguement pertaining to this issue, see the other post the same as this one...

oh, i could provide a link... but i wont. i wont... because you didnt take the time to see other posts before making another commisioner post.

short story shorter, don't veto.
Image

'Cause I'm Cow ... Boy ... for life.
no1cowboysfan
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Mock(ing) Drafter
Posts: 5255
Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Home Cafe: Football
Location: From Diego to tha bay ...

Postby Mudd » Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:11 pm

I don't think this trade is that one sided.

I would only veto in the case of collusion.
Mudd
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar

Posts: 714
Joined: 7 Jun 2003
Home Cafe: Football
Location: 1A, Famous Potatoes

Postby jerzey jetz » Wed Oct 06, 2004 9:46 pm

Is there something in it for you? Why would you veto it? If you do, you might as well manage the other 9 teams as well!
jerzey jetz
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 325
Joined: 14 Aug 2004
Home Cafe: Football

Postby Dominion » Thu Oct 07, 2004 9:41 am

Trade is fine.
Dominion
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff

User avatar
Sweet 16 SurvivorLucky Ladders Weekly Winner
Posts: 316
Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Home Cafe: Football

Previous

Return to Football Talk

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 6:36 hours
(and 38 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact