I'm sick of people using a change of teams to justify saying a player will be better or worse.
Example:
Peerless Price is the main man on Atlanta now so he's going to be really good. They don't really have much else to throw to.
Defenses will be keying on Eric Moulds this year because the Bills don't have Peerless Price anymore so his value goes down.
That's the same argument for one guy to be better and one to be worse. Is it good to be the main STUD on a team or is it good to be balanced? Doesn't it have to be one or the other?
Hines Ward and Plaxico's value goes down because they cancel each other out.
Ladanian Tomlinson will be better because Boston (alliteration) gives the offense another option.
Which is it?

Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey






















