Charlie Garner

[Vikes Rule 88]

Ho will he do last year he hand 1900 apy and 91 receptions to go along with 11 TDs and 0 fumbles . seems good to me but no one ever talks about him

[Homeless]

Youre right, people dont often talk about him and he often slips under the draft radar and falls lower than he really should


Shhhhhhh

[drunkenmonkey]

Decent number two back once you factor in the catches, but the Raiders just don't seem to want to use him that much which is why he falls low in a lot of drafts. Not to mention all the goal-line touches he loses to Crockett.

If you knew last year Stacy Mack was going to get nine touchdowns on the goal-line, would you have been that excited about Fred Taylor?

[MCG321]

If your league gives points for receptions, his stock rises a lot.

[Azrael]

Building on the Taylor comment, I think he will be a 2nd round steal since Mack is not there and he's showed FINALLY he can go a whole year. I'll probably take Taylor in the 2nd round unless Cliff Harris can convince my whole league Marshall Faulk is the 13th best back, then I'll take Marshall.

[Ousmagic]

im one of those that doesnt think too highly on garner eventually the age of this offense should catch up with them

[ScreamingWeasel]

Youre right, people dont often talk about him and he often slips under the draft radar and falls lower than he really should
Shhhhhhh

Yep. One of those secret weapons.
I like Charlie a lot, and when he's sitting there 5th or 6th or 7th round, like he usually is, it's a fine pick.
My 2 cents, anyway.
~Da Wease